IBB effects on expected runs

On SABR-L, Tom Hanrahan suggested taking a simulator and running it using the current SF Giant's statistics. Then, run the simulator with an intentional walk given to Barry Bonds whenever there is a base open. Reducing Bonds' "no base open" rate by an appropriate amount will create the same team totals, but will it affect expected runs? He also suggested doing this with a control group.

I don't have a simulator, but I do have some Markov matrices left over from class. I realized that I could modify the Markov matrices to work out the expected values.
A few caveats: I've been unable to get Retrosheet data properly analyzed on my upgraded computer, so I estimated the various advancement parameters for groundouts and flyouts. I also left out errors and steals. For singles, I used John Jarvis' advancement data at http://knology.net/~johnfjarvis/stats.html to estimate advancement on singles and doubles. (This should be refined so that there is more advancement with 2 outs, and for left-handed batters) I assumed that DP's occurred on 30% of the groundballs in DP situations, which seemed to give a few to many DPs, but I guessed that the missing stolen bases could account for that. I had SFs on half the fly/pops that occurred in SF situations. This gave totals that seem a bit low, but not terrible.
So, what I did was put in the Giants lineup using their current lineup. For "pitchers" I used the average 2001 pitcher.('cuz that's what I had) This then gave 162 game totals for each player, listed below. The second set of stats is for players when Bonds is always walked with runners on and first base open(RO1O). As Tom suggested, I reduced his "no base open" walk rate. RRF is "Runs Responsible For", rather than RBI - so this includes runs that were sent in by a DP.

The "regular stats"

batter    PA  BB  AB   1b 2b 3b HR R  RRF   SO  SF GDP
Lofton   792  90 700  125 39 12 12 106  54  86 2.4 11
Aurilia  774  49 720  114 47  3 20 109  76 120 4.6 17
Kent     754  58 692  127 47  3 41 133 118 112 4.8 15
Bonds    737 242 491   86 38  2 56 152 142  57 4.3  7
Santiago 725  38 681  125 34  7 23  89 125 103 6.4 26
Sanders  707  59 641   94 29  8 29  87 112 153 6.6 19
Snow     688  83 599   99 37  3 37  87 116 127 5.8 12
Bell     672  59 608   91 32  2 22  61  85  88 5.3 14
Pitchers 653  22 627   73 14  1  3  37  34 235 4.6 18
Total   6503 701 5757 933 316 41 243 861.7 1081 45 140
Here, Bonds' had 76.498 expected occurances of RO1O.

"walking Bonds"

XS
batter    PA  BB  AB   1b 2b 3b HR  R  RRF   SO  SF GDP
Lofton   793  90 700  126 39 12 12 105  55   86 2.4 11
Aurilia  774  49 721  114 47  3 20 107  77  120 4.6 17
Kent     755  58 692  127 47  3 41 129 118  112 4.8 15
Bonds2   737 242 491   86 38  2 56 152 125   57 4.7  8
Santiago 726  38 681  125 34  7 23  88 130  104 6.6 25
Sanders  707  59 641   94 29  8 29  87 115  153 6.9 19
Snow     688  83 599   99 37  3 37  87 116  127 5.8 12
Bell     672  59 608   91 32  2 22  61  85   88 5.2 14
Pitchers 654  22 627   73 14  1  3  37  34  235 4.6 19
        6508 701 5761 933 316 41 243 853.51 1082 46 140
The expected number of runs dropped by about 1%. Suggesting that picking your spots to walk a batter makes a small difference.
Letting this new Bonds hit away all the time gives the following:

Bonds2 "hits away"

batter   PA   BB  AB   1b 2b 3b HR   R  RRF  SO  SF GDP
Lofton   787  89 695  124 39 12 12  105  54  85 2.4 11
Aurilia  769  49 715  114 46  3 20  108  76 119 4.6 17
Kent     749  57 687  126 46  3 41  131 117 112 4.7 15
Bonds2   731 183 544   95 42  3 62  149 156  64 4.7  8
Santiago 719  38 675  124 34  7 22   87 115 103 5.8 22
Sanders  701  59 636   93 29  8 29   86 105 152 5.9 18
Snow     683  83 595   98 36  3 36   86 111 126 5.4 12
Bell     667  59 603   90 32  2 22   61  83  87 5.1 14
Pitchers 648  22 622   72 14  1  3   37  33 233 4.5 18
Total   6454 639 5772 935 318 41 247 849.34 1080 43 135
This Bonds has more RBI (and more HR due to more AB), but the team scores 4 fewer runs than if he were intentionally walked.

Using the average of the "regular stats" to generate a uniform lineup, The run totals for hitters 1-9 were:
109,106,99, 97,96,93, 90,88,86
The RRF were
93,96,100, 104,101,96, 93,92,90
for a total of 864.26 runs.

Had this represented the totals with the cleanup hitter getting walked with 1b open, the run/RRF totals were:
R : 109,104,96, 96,95,93, 91,88,86
RRF: 93,96,100, 88,106,100, 94,91,89
for a total of 856.32 runs.
Again, shifting walks to 1b-open drops about 1% off "runs expected from these totals"

Had the clean-up hitter, with the orignal walk rate been walked when 1b was open, his walks leap from 80 to 143,and the R/RRF are:
R : 111,107,100, 106,97,94, 92,89,87
RRF: 94,97,101, 82,118,109, 99,94,91
for a total of 883.09 runs.

So, walking Bonds appears to add about 4 runs per season. walking that "average" hitter would add about 19 runs/yr.

oddity: In 2001, Bonds and Snow had the same number of singles(49). They repeated this in 2002(70 singles).

e-mail: john.rickert@rose-hulman.edu

Other Baseball related stuff.